TradingView
wsbza
Aug 14, 2017 10:55 AM

possible wave count 

GERMAN STOCK INDEX (DAX)TVC

Description

Initial wave (a) done?

Comment

not much of change so far

Comment

triangle (b) or zigzag (b) with a triangle b

Comment

Fibo 50% or 61.8% re-tracement may defend short-term bulls

Comment

close to a trend reversal ?

Comment

previous alter count won

Comment

bearish assumption

Comment

expanded flat still possible

Comment

Comment

Comment

it seems wave (b) has some unfinished business

Comment

triangle x or flat b ?

Comment

could be another c of (b) up

Comment

could be a complex (b) wave

Comment

the short-term decline is getting sharper, maybe wave (b) or (ii) is done

Comment

the short-term picture is not very clear, could be more sideways

Comment

well, if this is truly a bearish structure, we should see lower degree consolidations that may allow us to join with bears

Comment

Comment

still expecting wave (c) decline

Comment

The triangle (b) wave is no longer valid as DAX made a new high today
This left us with 3 possible scenarios:
- Expanded Flat wave 4
- Running Triangle wave 4
- Extended wave 3

Comment

bearish flag short set up

Comment

Comment

Comment

green wave {C} is about 2 times the length of green wave {A}, probably a good time to take the profit

Comment

potential (i)-(ii)-i-ii count
Comments
J0seLu1s
Hi, Do you think it's gonna go down 12844 before go up till 13265??
wsbza
@J0seLu1s, to be honest I do not know, there are number of different counts, ideally I would prefer to see more sideways corrective pattern before another sell off starts. if my abc flat =(w) then another (x) wave could either break w wave low or not, then make another abc for Y or abcde for Y. If my count was wrong, say my pink c is actually only the start of the correction, we could have c=a', if wave a'=5 i would not expect it have deep wave b' but if internal of wave a'=3 it is more likely to see a deep retracement
J0seLu1s
@wsbza, Thx so much.
wsbza
@J0seLu1s, Assume the initial decline(i to v within the white channel) is wave (i) or (a), if the subsequent decline is sharper than wave (i), then maybe my a-b-c is wave(ii)
J0seLu1s
@wsbza, yep, thats the same I was thinking the same right now, lets see what happen. Keep up the great work.
Walentine
wsbza
@Walentine, looks like your count is more accurate
More