It doesn't make sense that a s*#$ coin would be the first out the gate, right? If you're a crypto fan-boy, you might ask, how can a badly plagiarized coin be the first one to "moon"? I mean come on, it has 0 development, a community that has 0 interest in anything other than speculation, and a founder who jumped from his own ship when the temptation to sell became too hard to resist during the 2017 parabolic run. Right, RIGHT?!?!?!?! Well, those are all the reasons it's first mover, the bottom appears to be in, damn the fundamentals. Before you get indoctrinated and pledge your allegiance to 'crypto silver', just remember the cost/benefit analysis tips the balance in favor of a 51% attack against any coin except for Bitcoin. If you had enough money, and didn't have to worry about getting caught, you could make a profit. Get in, get out, reallocate to something you wouldn't mind holding onto for a while.
Comment
⋅
possibility 2 shown with the white overlay. but i think it's just going to go straight up. seriously...
Why do you need pepsi when you have cola? Why do you need samsung when you have apple? Get my point? We are already moving into multi-polar world so why not a multi-coin world? Besides, the 0.1% have already decided that's the plan. Not much you can do about it. Just don't get caught hodling the fiat bag when the bankster's hammer finally comes down.
fugasok
⋅
@fortunekr, if we have only apple devices in out world then i would jump from a cliff. Apple devices are very bad. They tell you that they are good, but they are not.
DrJoJopama
⋅
The parabolic rise is undoubtedly possible, while your negative sentiment is laughable.
@BlockchainFaith, if xbt_bottom == 'in': shit_coins = 'moon' - just kidding, but not really, it'll be a mini-alt-season, one that will be repeated only once more during this run.