See, just read their moronic response. They hide their reasons behind regulations and obligations.
For all those out there, I didn't recommend my wife. It just so happened that both my wife and I like the Quantower platform (had they actually read the review, they would see this), not AMP broker.
Think about this: when a business encounters a bad review, they would offer to rectify the problem or improve on themselves. Instead, in their comments, they sarcastically say that I recommend my wife when I didn't and they hide behind regulatory reasons. In response, this is what I will say: when they emailed me and say they don't want to work with me, they used regulatory reasons but they shut me out and won't give me access to see what trades I made that they claimed that violate their policies. After that, I emailed them many times and they just ignored all the emails. When they sent the email to my wife, all they said was they cant do business with my wife. They didn't even give any reasons.
This is not the only issue. In my original review, I mentioned that they don't take responsibility for anything. If my trades get lagged or stuck because of them, they blamed it on Tradingview or the connection. They hold no responsibility. If you do business with clients and you are the one that chose that connection, you have responsibilities.
Ameritrade(Schwab), although has its own problems, but they acknowledge when it is their fault and they actually refund me money or adjust my balance.
When they respond, they always say please contact us so we can help you, but behind the scene, they are all BS. They just don't want the public to see the real reviews.
All you have to do is look at the negative reviews and see how similar they are. The 5 star reviews you have to take it with a grain of salt since they can be easily fakes. For example: look at Zeal25: look at their response, very typical ...denials. That was one of the same issues I had with them.
