Yesterday's closing at 921.85 is below the high of Rs. 931 achieved on 31.10.23, which means that the current upswing with peak of Rs. 950.45 is not wave 3 of the impulse (if that was a failed diagonal). As such, the ending diagonal theory remains.
The peak of 950.45 marks end of wave 4 of ending diagonal with satisfactory three wave pattern. Hence, the current fall off this peak, is making final wave 5 of the ending diagonal with a target of 890, which should go with heavy volumes and maybe with exhaustion gaps. Post this, a sharp retracement back up should be expected, to travel the whole distance again back to peak of atleast 997. This level also means breaching the Fib band of -2.618 suggesting recovery as observed in past. Further, MACD line appears to be ready to cut signal line from top, algos may be triggered to open short positions, supporting downwards fall.
The entire movement, in the form of ending diagonal speaks of upward bias, for the following reasons:
1) Wave 3 is just 85.4% of wave 1, ideal ratio was atleast 1 if not 1.618
2) Wave 3 was retraced 85.4% by wave 4, though a 50% was adequate.
3) Wave 4 revisited the territory of wave 1, which twice visit is not generally seen.
4) Volumes during wave 2 and 4 were fairly well maintained, as compared to wave 1 & 3, generally a thinner volume was expected.
5) Retracement of wave A by B, is more than 61.8%, indicating upward bias. This was also the starting point of diagonal.
6) Wave 2 of diagonal indicated ordinary movement, i.e. the diagonal should have formed with adequate length, but wave 4 behaviour suggests that ordinary movement is interrupted by upward bias.
Above reasons, make me reach a conclusion that underlying forces are bullish and retracement below 889 has very low delta.
I continue to hold longs, will accumulate more at 889 levels. If it falls beyond that level, then the exposure would move from my trading book to investment book with a horizon of 1-2 years. The fundamentals remain solid to my understanding and yesterday's move of RBI to increase risk weight for unsecured loans, would in medium term, if not immediately, benefit banks more than it would hurt. It would be NBFCs which would be hurt more than banks.
I would be glad to hear views / suggestions/ corrections from community on this.
NB : I continue to remain unconvinced on the theory of current correction after end of leading diagonal of primary wave 1, my estimates / conclusion of wave numbering remain valid to me.