Late Entry: $NZD vs. $JPY: Predictive Analysis/Forecast #forex
Traders,
Sorry for this late entry. Analysis originates from early December - Please, ignore TG-1 hit to keep it honest.
Here is what I posted as a retrospective commentary on the "Predictive Analysis?Forecasting" chatroom today - I hope this makes things right by you:
===============================
* * * 10 DEC 2014 * * * - H4:I thought I saved this chart as a preliminary study on December 02nd, 2014, when I built the chart. However, I cannot locate the chart in TradingView. Please, ignore the dates on the chart, as it may give the impression that I defined the targets after the fact. My apologies on that. Still, the analysis/forecasting is genuine and original.Analysis should have included a comment on NZD expected decline based on bearish dairy news and sovereign central bank action towards keeping or decreasing rates (very bearish for NZD) versus recent analysis on the and $ES revealing a probable reversal - It hit target since then and rolled quite drastically. The NET effect on should be a cantilevered force to the downside on the pair. David Alcindor
================================
(Source: www.tradingview.com/chat/ )
In any case, the primary target was easily identifiable by its relation to Fibonacci's 1.414 and 1.618 extensions following completion of 5th wave.
Price has since reversed to the projection of a lower bullish trendline born out of Point-4 and the next higher low point.
For fundamental reasons stated above, the market is likely to maintain bearish pressure at these levels.
On technical grounds, I would look for the failure of 91.810 as an early indication of further softening of bullish ground, thus opening up to the following bearish targets:
1 - TG-1 = 90.796 - 02 DEC 2014 (done already, but likely to impose a R/S effect on price action)
2 - TG-2 = 80.517 - 02 DEC 2014
3 - TG-Lo - 87.662 - 02 DEC 2014
and
4 - TG-x - 84.787 - 02 DEC 2014
Numerical targets carry a higher prop value, in contrast to nominal targets. However, numerical targets only impose shallow Fibonacci retracement, whereas nominal targets are high-prob reversal 9i.e.: minimum of 0.618+)
David Alcindor
Predictive Analysis & Forecasting
Denver, Colorado - USA
-----
Twitter: @4xForecaster
-----
Sorry for this late entry. Analysis originates from early December - Please, ignore TG-1 hit to keep it honest.
Here is what I posted as a retrospective commentary on the "Predictive Analysis?Forecasting" chatroom today - I hope this makes things right by you:
===============================
* * * 10 DEC 2014 * * * - H4:I thought I saved this chart as a preliminary study on December 02nd, 2014, when I built the chart. However, I cannot locate the chart in TradingView. Please, ignore the dates on the chart, as it may give the impression that I defined the targets after the fact. My apologies on that. Still, the analysis/forecasting is genuine and original.Analysis should have included a comment on NZD expected decline based on bearish dairy news and sovereign central bank action towards keeping or decreasing rates (very bearish for NZD) versus recent analysis on the and $ES revealing a probable reversal - It hit target since then and rolled quite drastically. The NET effect on should be a cantilevered force to the downside on the pair. David Alcindor
================================
(Source: www.tradingview.com/chat/ )
In any case, the primary target was easily identifiable by its relation to Fibonacci's 1.414 and 1.618 extensions following completion of 5th wave.
Price has since reversed to the projection of a lower bullish trendline born out of Point-4 and the next higher low point.
For fundamental reasons stated above, the market is likely to maintain bearish pressure at these levels.
On technical grounds, I would look for the failure of 91.810 as an early indication of further softening of bullish ground, thus opening up to the following bearish targets:
1 - TG-1 = 90.796 - 02 DEC 2014 (done already, but likely to impose a R/S effect on price action)
2 - TG-2 = 80.517 - 02 DEC 2014
3 - TG-Lo - 87.662 - 02 DEC 2014
and
4 - TG-x - 84.787 - 02 DEC 2014
Numerical targets carry a higher prop value, in contrast to nominal targets. However, numerical targets only impose shallow Fibonacci retracement, whereas nominal targets are high-prob reversal 9i.e.: minimum of 0.618+)
David Alcindor
Predictive Analysis & Forecasting
Denver, Colorado - USA
-----
Twitter: @4xForecaster
-----
