Get started

Multiple Time Frame Analysis

Short setup on Oberoi Realty- Setup: Price has entered a strong supply zone that aligns with the weekly EMA 21, 50 and a broader weekly supply zone, creating confluence for potential rejection. - Entry: Short positions initiated near the supply zone. - Stop Loss: Placed just above the supply zone to protect against invalidation. - Target: First target at ₹1,516.20, with scope to trail further if momentum continues. - Volume Profile: A notable volume node adds weight to the rejection thesis. - Structure: Prior pivot levels have already been broken, signaling weakness and validating bearish bias. 📌 Bias: Bearish continuation expected as long as price respects the supply zone
NSE:OBEROIRLTYShort
by the_sailor_trader
NIFTY is still weak and can break below anytime sooner$ As we can see NIFTY had been weak throughout the day despite getting rejected from the demand zone and the only hope is because it could maintain itself above the demand zone else a massive sell off could have taken place so now as soon as NIFTY breaks below the demand zone, that would potentially act as a supply zone giving fuel to the fire and exceeding weakness so plan your trades accordingly and keep watching the important zones.
NSE:NIFTY
by Kaushalfin
NIFTY at MAKE or BREAK AREA!!As we can see NIFTY has finally reached it trendline resistance which previously acted as a trendline support and an immediate supply zone can also be seen around 25500 so any signs of rejection could show strong weakness on the other hand if manages to break and sustain above 25500 then we may see another strong upmove in NIFTY as it would not only break the supply zone but also would break the trend line adding fuel to the fire so plan your trades accordingly and keep watching everyone .
NSE:NIFTY
by Kaushalfin
Why Good Setups Fail: The CAP NOTES That Block Bad Trades (ECI)ECI Panel (Execution Confidence Index) Why this panel exists: execution governance, not prediction Most traders don’t lose because they “didn’t know direction.” They lose because they entered during low-quality execution conditions: mixed timeframes, thin liquidity, unstable volatility, or a setup that exists only on one chart layer. The ECI Panel is built to solve that exact problem. It is not a signal. It is a permission layer: It compresses multiple execution risks into one readable state. It stops “impulse entries” when the environment is structurally unstable. It forces a trader to execute only when the market allows clean follow-through. What ECI is measuring (in practical terms) ECI is not “confidence” as emotion. ECI is confidence as market permission. It answers one question: “If I execute right now, what is the probability that the market structure can carry the trade without forcing me into damage-control?” The panel typically outputs: ECI SCORE (Quality / Permission level) RISK MOD (Risk modifier status) CAP NOTES (Execution caps / constraints that limit trade validity) CAP NOTES: the most important part of the panel A trader can see a perfect entry candle and still be wrong — not because the setup is bad, but because the execution environment is capped. CAP NOTES are non-negotiable constraints. They don’t say “buy/sell.” They say: “Even if your setup is valid, the market is currently limiting execution performance.” Think of it like this: Setup = your idea CAP NOTES = the market’s permission boundaries ECI = the final execution gate If CAP NOTES are active, ECI is telling you: “Reduce size, delay entry, require stronger confirmation, or do not trade.” Example from the panel shown Your panel shows: ECI SCORE: 38 (No-Trade) RISK MOD: OFF CAP NOTES: MTF CONFLICT | LOW LIQ This is a textbook “execution-capped” environment. Let’s break those CAP NOTES down. 1) MTF CONFLICT (Multi-Timeframe Conflict) What it means MTF Conflict is when higher timeframe intent is not aligned with the execution timeframe trigger. Common real-market situations: HTF is in distribution / reversal zone, while LTF shows a continuation entry. HTF is bearish structure, LTF prints bullish breakout (often a trap / mitigation move). HTF premium/discount context contradicts LTF entry direction. HTF liquidity is targeted in the opposite direction of your LTF plan. Why it kills execution quality When timeframes conflict, price tends to behave like this: sharp spikes fake breakouts stop hunts whipsaw around levels follow-through failure Even if you “win,” the trade becomes messy: large drawdown before moving hard stop placement emotional management load increases How to execute when MTF CONFLICT is present MTF conflict doesn’t always mean “never trade.” It means you must upgrade requirements. Execution rules (professional gating): Trade only in the direction of HTF bias, unless you have an explicit reversal model. If you take a counter-trend scalp: smaller size faster TP tighter invalidation no “hope holding” Demand clear confirmation before entry: displacement + structure break in your direction clean retest / mitigation liquidity sweep + reclaim If HTF is near key zones (range extremes / major OB / major liquidity): treat every LTF breakout as suspect until confirmed In short: MTF conflict converts “normal trading” into “advanced trading.” If you don’t upgrade your confirmation, you’re just paying the market tuition. 2) LOW LIQ (Low Liquidity Condition) What it means Low Liquidity is not “market is quiet.” It means the order book environment is not supporting clean execution. This happens typically: outside active sessions between session transitions during pre-news hesitation after major impulses when market pauses during thin participation windows Why it damages execution Low liquidity causes: slippage and poor fills random wicks “one-candle stop-outs” spreads widening price jumping levels without trading through them In low liquidity, levels don’t behave “technically.” They behave mechanically: gaps, thin prints, abrupt sweeps. How to trade when LOW LIQ is present You have two choices: Option A: Don’t trade. This is the professional choice for consistency. Option B: Trade with liquidity-adjusted execution rules Use confirmation entry (no blind limit entries) Require stronger structure break Reduce leverage / size Use wider invalidation or smaller position — never both high-risk Take partial profits faster Avoid holding through “dead zones” Simple truth: Low liquidity turns good setups into low R:R outcomes because execution friction increases. Why CAP NOTES matter more than indicators Indicators are usually about “what price did.” CAP NOTES are about “what price can realistically do next without breaking your execution.” This is the real difference: A setup can be valid on chart. But CAP NOTES can still make it untradeable in live execution. CAP NOTES protect you from: trading inside chop disguised as signals taking entries during unstable participation forcing trades when market structure is not ready How ECI + CAP NOTES should control your decision Use a 3-state execution system: State 1: NO-TRADE (ECI low + CAP NOTES active) Observe only Build context Wait for caps to clear Do not “revenge trade” the chop State 2: CAUTION TRADE (ECI mid + 1 CAP NOTE active) Reduce size Require better confirmation Tight rules on invalidation Faster profit-taking State 3: PERMISSION TRADE (ECI high + caps clear) Standard sizing Standard invalidation Allow trade to breathe Higher expectancy follow-through In your screenshot, ECI 38 (No-Trade) with MTF Conflict + Low Liq is clearly State 1. That is not weakness. That is discipline automation. The real value: ECI makes you consistent under pressure Traders fail most during: after a big move after a loss when they “feel they missed it” when market becomes noisy ECI + CAP NOTES solve that by removing emotional override. They don’t “predict.” They enforce execution quality. That is how consistency is built. CAP NOTES Dictionary (ECI Panel) What “CAPS” mean in MARAL execution language CAP NOTES = Execution Constraints They are not opinions. They are environmental limitations that reduce trade expectancy even when a setup looks good. Rule: 1 CAP active → reduce risk / require stronger confirmation 2+ CAPS active → no-trade unless you are executing a specialized model (advanced) CAPS cleared → normal execution permission CAP 01 — MTF CONFLICT Meaning: Higher-timeframe bias is opposing the current execution direction (HTF flow disagrees with dir). Risk: Follow-through becomes inconsistent; traps/stop-runs increase; LTF triggers fail more often. Best action: Stand down until HTF context stops opposing (prefer MTF ALIGNED/MIXED). Upgrade rule: If executing anyway, reduce size and require displacement + acceptance/retest before entry. CAP 02 — VOL REGIME Meaning: Volatility is outside your tradable operating band (ATR% not within your min/max bounds). Risk: ATR-based SL/TP loses reliability; price either stalls (too low vol) or whipsaws (too high vol). Best action: Avoid normal execution until volatility normalizes into the band. Upgrade rule: If forced to trade, reduce leverage/size and use structure-based invalidation (confirmation-only entries). CAP 03 — ADX WEAK Meaning: Trend strength is insufficient (ADX below threshold); market is prone to rotation/chop. Risk: Continuation expectancy drops; fake breaks increase; holding winners becomes difficult. Best action: Wait for ADX to recover or trade only the cleanest confirmations. Upgrade rule: Require displacement + structure follow-through (BOS + acceptance) and reduce risk. CAP 04 — RSI CHOP Meaning: Momentum is indecisive (RSI inside the chop band between your bear/bull levels). Risk: Whipsaw environment; both long/short attempts get punished; signal quality collapses. Best action: Stand down until RSI exits the chop band and direction is confirmed. Upgrade rule: Only trade after RSI exits chop + price prints confirmation (displacement and/or structural break). CAP 05 — STRUCT NEUTRAL Meaning: No confirmed HH/HL or LL/LH sequence; structure bias is neutral (structBias == 0). Risk: Invalidation and targets become unclear; entries become location-poor; rotation risk rises. Best action: Wait for structure to resolve into Bull Struct or Bear Struct. Upgrade rule: If trading neutral structure, require liquidity interaction + displacement (sweep/reclaim style confirmation). CAP 06 — LOW LIQ Meaning: Liquidity context is LOW (no sweep/event and not near PDH/PDL proximity). Risk: Internal noise dominates; moves lack fuel; breakouts often fail or stall. Best action: Wait for liquidity context to improve (NEUTRAL near PDH/PDL or HIGH via sweep/event). Upgrade rule: If executing, reduce size and demand stronger confirmation (displacement + acceptance, no blind entries). CAP 07 — DIV NEG Meaning: Divergence is against your current direction (negative risk modifier when Divergence module is ON). Risk: Continuation becomes fragile; deeper pullbacks; late entries get punished; expectancy compresses. Best action: Avoid late entries and avoid adding risk into extension. Upgrade rule: Prefer pullback/mitigation entries only; manage active trades tighter (protect/scale earlier). Default — NO MAJOR CAPS Meaning: None of the above caps are currently active (under enabled modules). Risk: Not a guarantee—only indicates no ECI blockers detected by this build. Best action: Execute normally while still following your setup/permission/risk rules. Upgrade rule: Maintain standard confirmations; do not override risk discipline. CAP NOTES are not “warnings to ignore.” They are execution limits. When a cap is active, the market is telling you: “Your setup may be visible, but your execution edge is capped.” The professional response is not to trade harder — it is to tighten permission. How to use CAP NOTES correctly: Treat ECI SCORE as the quality meter, and CAP NOTES as the gatekeeper. If CAP NOTES increase, your job is to reduce exposure, not increase conviction. If you feel urgency (“I might miss the move”), that’s usually the moment CAP NOTES are protecting you the most. MARAL Rule When conditions are capped, your best trade is often no trade. Consistency is built by the trades you refuse, not the trades you force. Reminder: ECI is a decision-support layer. It does not replace risk management, position sizing, or personal accountability. Always execute within your predefined risk limits. Note : This article is educational and explains a decision-support framework. It is not financial advice, not a promise of performance, and not a buy/sell signal service. Trading involves risk; always apply your own risk management and confirm conditions independently. #TradingPsychology #RiskManagement #TradingDiscipline #TradingEducation #PriceAction #MarketStructure #Liquidity #SmartMoneyConcepts #MultiTimeFrame #Volatility #ADX #RSI
FOREXCOM:XAUUSDEducation
by MARAL_Execution_Workflow
UPL Short Trade Setup UPL has broken a prior pivot low signaling potential weakness. Price is retracing toward supply zone which aligns with the 50 and 21 EMA confluence on the daily chart—a strong area of resistance. This zone offers a high-probability short entry, targeting a move back toward the higher time frame demand zone. Trade Plan: - Entry: On rejection from the zone - Stop Loss: Above supply zone at 15 % Datr - Target: (1:3 RR) Trade entry remains invalid if price moves down before retracement creating a lower low and lower high.
NSE:UPLShort
by the_sailor_trader
0/0, 1/0, 0/1 Explained: MARAL Liquidity Conditions Liquidity Isn’t an Entry — It’s a Test (XAUUSD Case Study) This XAUUSD chart is a textbook example of why most traders misunderstand liquidity in live markets. Price moved strongly higher over multiple sessions, creating a clear bullish structure. Many traders see this and immediately think: “Trend is up → buy pullbacks.” That assumption is exactly where execution errors begin. What This Chart Actually Shows (Objectively) Strong directional move Price advanced cleanly from the 4700s into the 5100s. Momentum expansion is obvious. Structure remains intact. Price now stalling near prior highs The market is no longer impulsive. Candles compress. Wicks increase. Range tightens This is no longer a trend-entry environment. This is a liquidity decision zone. Liquidity Reality on This Chart Liquidity is not something you predict. It is something price either takes or doesn’t take. On this chart: Buy-side liquidity sits above recent highs. Sell-side liquidity sits below recent higher lows. At the current price: Buy-side liquidity is not yet clearly accepted. Sell-side liquidity is not yet clearly taken. Meaning: Price is between liquidity pools. This is the most dangerous zone for live trading. Why the “Middle” Is Where Accounts Get Damaged When price is between liquidity pools: Risk-to-reward becomes asymmetric. Breakouts lack confirmation. Reversals lack fuel. Entries become emotional, not structural. Most losing trades happen here, not at extremes. This is why MARAL treats the middle as a WAIT zone, not an opportunity. What MARAL Waits for on This Chart MARAL does not ask: “Is gold bullish?” It asks: “Has liquidity been resolved in a way that permits execution?” There are only two valid next steps: 1) Buy-Side Liquidity Taken + Acceptance Price takes the highs. Holds above them. Builds acceptance (not just a wick). Only then does continuation become executable. 2) Buy-Side Liquidity Taken + Rejection Price takes the highs. Fails to hold. Closes back into range. Only then does mean reversion or pullback logic activate. Until one of these happens, MARAL stays inactive. Why This Protects Live Traders Without liquidity rules, traders: Buy into resistance. Sell into support. Chase candles. Tighten stops randomly. Overtrade ranges. With liquidity rules: Trades are earned, not guessed. Entries happen after information, not before. Risk is defined by structure, not emotion. MARAL’s job is not to find more trades. It is to block bad ones. Key Takeaway from This XAUUSD Chart This chart is not saying “buy” or “sell.” It is saying: “Wait until liquidity makes the decision for you.” Liquidity tells you where stops were hit. Execution permission comes from what price does after that. Until then: No prediction. No anticipation. No forced entries. MARAL Liquidity Conditions (0/1) — Execution Rules In MARAL, liquidity isn’t “concept.” It’s a binary event gate. 0.00 = not triggered. 1.00 = triggered. Reference pools: PDH = Prev Day High → Buy-side liquidity PDL = Prev Day Low → Sell-side liquidity 1) 0.00 / 0.00 → “NO LIQUIDITY EVENT” Price is between pools: Candle High < PDH Candle Low > PDL ✅ Meaning: No sweep happened. You’re in the middle zone. MARAL prefers WAIT / reduce size / demand extra confirmation. 2) 1.00 / 0.00 → “BUY-SIDE SWEEP EVENT” Triggered when price tags / wicks above PDH (or a defined swing high). ✅ Meaning: stops above highs were likely harvested. Next decision is NOT “buy.” Next decision is “accept or reject above PDH.” 3) 0.00 / 1.00 → “SELL-SIDE SWEEP EVENT” Triggered when price tags / wicks below PDL (or a defined swing low). ✅ Meaning: stops below lows were likely harvested. Next decision is NOT “sell.” Next decision is “accept or reject below PDL.” 4) 1.00 / 1.00 → “DUAL SWEEP / RANGE LIQUIDITY” Both sides got taken in the same session/window: A push above highs AND a push below lows ✅ Meaning: stop-hunt environment / expansion trap risk. MARAL demands structure reclaim + volatility control before any entry. Post-sweep MARAL decision gates (the real edge) After any sweep (Buy-side or Sell-side), MARAL waits for one of two outcomes: A) Acceptance (Continuation permitted) Price holds beyond the swept level Follow-through candles confirm ✅ Interpretation: the sweep was breakout fuel, not a trap. B) Rejection (Reversal / pullback permitted) Price wicks beyond the level then closes back inside Reclaim confirms ✅ Interpretation: the sweep was liquidity grab, not real continuation. Golden rule Liquidity flag = “where stops got hit.” Entry permission = “what price did AFTER stops got hit.” MARAL Liquidity: How It Helps Live Trading (Not Theory) Most traders know liquidity. They still lose live — because they trade it too early or in the middle. MARAL turns liquidity into execution gates so you don’t “guess.” You wait for the event, then trade the reaction. 1) MARAL converts liquidity into a binary live signal (0/1) Liquidity becomes usable when it’s measurable: Buy-side Liquidity (High) = stops above highs (PDH / swing highs) Sell-side Liquidity (Low) = stops below lows (PDL / swing lows) 0.00 = not triggered on this bar/window 1.00 = triggered on this bar/window This is huge live, because it kills imagination: “Did price actually take the pool, yes or no?” 2) 0/0 is NOT “nothing” — it’s a warning Buy = 0.00 and Sell = 0.00 means: price is between pools. Live meaning: you are in mid-range RR becomes random both directions can wick you out How it helps traders: MARAL stops you from trading the worst zone where most retail accounts get chopped. 3) 1/0 or 0/1 tells you: “Liquidity event just happened” When you see: 1/0 → buy-side liquidity taken (stops above highs hit) 0/1 → sell-side liquidity taken (stops below lows hit) Live meaning: the market just did its “stop run” now the real question is acceptance vs rejection How it helps traders: You stop entering into the sweep. You wait for what price does after the sweep. 4) The real edge is post-sweep behavior (MARAL live rule) After a liquidity grab, MARAL expects only 2 outcomes: A) Acceptance (continuation allowed) price holds beyond the swept level follow-through candles confirm ✅ Meaning: sweep acted as fuel B) Rejection (reversal/pullback allowed) wick beyond level then closes back inside reclaim confirms ✅ Meaning: sweep was a trap collection How it helps traders: This is how you avoid the #1 mistake: “I bought the wick.” / “I sold the wick.” 5) 1/1 is a live “danger mode” Both sides taken (in same session/window) = stop-hunt environment. Live meaning: range expansion fakeouts increase structure becomes unreliable How it helps traders: MARAL forces extra confirmation or reduces trade frequency. You stop treating volatility as opportunity when it’s actually noise risk. MARAL Liquidity Summary (Live Trading) Liquidity is not a setup. It’s a test. 0/0 → middle zone → WAIT 1/0 or 0/1 → sweep happened → trade only after acceptance/rejection 1/1 → stop-hunt regime → high confirmation needed. Final Note This analysis is educational, focused on execution behavior, not signals or financial advice. Use it to improve decision quality, not to chase outcomes. #Trading #Liquidity #SMC #PriceAction #RiskManagement #Forex #Crypto #XAUUSD #NAS100 #ICT #Liquidity #Engineering
FOREXCOM:XAUUSDEducation
by MARAL_Execution_Workflow
3
Hal short setupSpotted a high-probability short setup on Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd based on multi-timeframe confluence: - 🔴 Supply Zone aligned with Daily EMA 50 and Weekly EMA 50 – strong resistance cluster. - 🔄 Entry on retracement into the zone, post breakdown of prior pivot low. - 🟠 Stop Loss placed at 15% DATR above the zone for volatility buffer. - 🎯 Target set at 1:3 RR, respecting structure and momentum. - 📉 EMA 21 < EMA 50 confirms short bias The zone is placed with high probability. The trade is valid till the time price retraces to to level and moves down. The trade remains invalid if price moves down first to form lower high and lower low and then retraces back in sessions to come.
NSE:HALShort
by the_sailor_trader
1
Chapter 18 — The Reversal TrapWhy trying to catch tops & bottoms destroys accounts Most accounts don’t blow up from “bad strategy.” They blow up from one addictive behavior: forcing a reversal when the market has not granted reversal permission. A reversal is not a candle pattern. A reversal is a regime change — structure, participation, and liquidity behavior must all rotate together. 1) The trap: “It fell a lot, so it must bounce” After a strong impulsive move, your brain starts doing dangerous math: “It already dumped, downside is limited.” “This is a discount.” “I’ll catch the bottom with a tight SL.” “Just one bounce and I’m back.” That thinking is not analysis. That is recovery psychology wearing a technical mask. And the market punishes it because in a real downtrend, bounces are often just liquidation relief, not reversal. 2) What this chart is actually saying (not what you want it to say) Look at the execution readouts on the BTCUSD 1H chart: Context Board (right): Direction: Bearish H1 / H4 / Daily: Bearish Momentum: BEAR Liquidity Context: LOW Long Score: 10 (No-Trade) LTF Exec: WEAK Qualification Gate (top): SETUP: WAIT LIQUIDITY: LOW ENTRY PERMISSION: SKIP EDC (bottom-right): SETUP: WAIT ENTRY PERMISSION: SKIP LIQUIDITY: LOW ACTION STATE: HOLD This is not a “find the bottom” environment. This is the system telling you: the market is not offering clean participation, and long attempts are structurally unsupported. 3) Why reversals fail here (the mechanics) In bearish conditions with low liquidity: Price bounces easily (because thin liquidity lets it lift) Traders confuse bounce with reversal and enter early The next sell wave hits (often a liquidity sweep / reloading) Price drops back into the range Your “tight SL” becomes a guaranteed stop-out machine You re-enter to “get it right” → the real damage begins The trap is not one loss. The trap is repeat exposure inside a non-permission regime. 4) The hidden killer: “Bottom hunting” creates the worst R:R in reality On paper, catching bottoms looks like high reward. In practice, it produces: Low hit-rate entries Chop + wick environment Stop clusters hunted repeatedly Emotional re-entry loops Over-leverage temptation (“If I nail this bottom, it’s huge”) So even if you’re “right” once, the account is often already damaged by the attempts. 5) The professional rule: reversals are earned, not predicted A valid reversal is when the market proves three things: A) Structure shift Break of the bearish sequence (lower highs / lower lows) A reclaim that holds, not just taps B) Liquidity behavior changes Sweeps stop occurring “against you” Liquidity stops being LOW; participation becomes consistent C) Participation confirms Momentum stops bleeding Follow-through appears after the shift, not before it Until these are aligned, a “reversal” is just a pullback inside continuation. 6) The Reversal Permission Checklist (use this before touching tops/bottoms) A reversal attempt is only rational when most of these are true: HTF context is neutralizing (bearish pressure reducing, not accelerating) Liquidity is not LOW (no thin, stop-hunt conditions) Momentum stops being BEAR-dominant (chop resolves into directional intent) Long side stops showing “No-Trade” quality Entry permission is not SKIP LTF execution is not WEAK (execution conditions matter as much as direction) If the dashboard says WAIT / SKIP / LOW, your job is not to be clever. Your job is to protect capital and wait for permission. 7) The clean takeaway Tops & bottoms are where ego trades. Professionals don’t “guess” turning points — they trade after the market proves it has turned. If you want longevity: Stop trying to be first. Start trying to be right with permission. Catching a reversal is not a skill. Avoiding the reversal trap is the skill. #BTC #BTCUSD #Bitcoin #CryptoTrading #TradingPsychology #RiskManagement #Execution #NoTradeZone #MarketStructure #Liquidity #StopLossDiscipline #Overtrading #FOMO #ReversalTrap #TrendFollowing #CapitalPreservation #TradeManagement #PriceAction #Volatility #Discipline Educational content only. Not financial advice. Markets involve risk; use your own risk management and decision process.
COINBASE:BTCUSDEducation
by MARAL_Execution_Workflow