Gold at Make-or-Break Zone | Channel Support Under TestGold is currently trading inside a rising channel and has pulled back toward the lower side of the structure. This move looks more like a healthy correction rather than a breakdown, as long as price continues to hold the marked support area.
If buyers step in near channel support, upside continuation remains possible toward the higher zone. A clear break below support, however, would weaken the structure and shift the bias to the downside. For now, this is a wait-and-react zone, not a chase.
⚠️ Disclaimer
This analysis is for educational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Trading involves risk. Please do your own research and use proper risk management.
Priceaction
XAUUSD – H2 Technical AnalysisXAUUSD – H2 Technical Outlook: Short-Term Sell Pressure as Liquidity Gets Cleared | Lana ✨
Gold is showing signs of short-term weakness after an aggressive upside expansion. Price action suggests the market may continue to move lower in the near term, not as a trend reversal, but as a liquidity-driven correction within a broader bullish structure.
At this stage, the focus shifts from continuation to how price behaves while liquidity is being taken below structure.
📈 Market Structure & Price Behavior
The recent vertical rally has left the market overextended, making a corrective phase technically healthy.
Price has broken below short-term support and is now trading under a descending corrective trendline, signaling short-term bearish pressure.
This type of structure often develops when the market needs to clean buy-side positions before rebuilding for the next leg.
While the higher-timeframe trend remains bullish, the intraday bias has shifted to corrective / bearish until liquidity objectives are met.
🔍 Key Liquidity Zones on the Chart
Short-term sell zone: the descending trendline near current price As long as price reacts below this trendline, rallies are more likely to be sold.
Scalping buy liquidity: around 5050–5070 This area may generate temporary bounces, but reactions here should be treated as short-term only.
Key bullish order block: 4825 – 4830 A critical zone where stronger buyer participation may appear if the sell-off extends.
Major swing liquidity zone: 4613 – 4625 This is a high-confidence liquidity pocket where the market could complete a deeper correction and reset the broader bullish structure.
🎯 Trading Scenarios
Primary scenario – Continuation of the pullback: As long as price remains below the descending trendline, gold may continue to move lower to sweep liquidity below recent lows. This favors sell-on-rallies rather than buying strength.
Secondary scenario – Temporary reaction: Short-term bounces may occur around the 5050–5070 area, but without structural reclaim, these moves are more likely corrective than trend-changing.
Structural defense scenario: If price reaches the 4825–4830 or 4613–4625 zones, watch closely for signs of stabilization and absorption, which would signal that the liquidity objective has been completed.
🧠 Lana’s View
This move lower is best seen as liquidity cleanup, not panic selling. Lana stays patient during corrective phases, avoiding early longs and waiting for price to reach clear liquidity zones before reassessing bullish continuation.
✨ Let the market take what it needs, then look for structure to rebuild.
USDJPY Pullback Explained: Trend Support in Focus!For me, USDJPY is still behaving like a healthy uptrend, not a market that is rolling over. Price has been respecting a clear rising channel structure, with buyers consistently defending higher lows.
The recent move lower looks more like a pullback into major trend support rather than a sign of weakness. This is exactly how strong trends usually behave, they pause, retrace, and then decide the next leg based on support reaction.
From a broader perspective:
On the fundamental side, currencies are currently adjusting to shifting rate expectations and global risk sentiment. In such phases, trends rarely reverse immediately. Instead, price often retraces into key levels before continuing or changing structure.
What I’m watching now:
As long as the rising channel and demand zone hold, the overall structure remains intact. The next move will largely depend on how price reacts at this support, not on short-term volatility.
This is not a trade call, it’s an observation of market behavior and structure.
Disclaimer: This analysis is for educational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Trading involves risk.
Bitcoin at Demand: Where Most Traders Panic and Smart Money WaitWhen I look at this chart, I don’t see weakness.
I see price reacting exactly where it should .
Bitcoin is sitting above a clearly defined demand zone, and instead of collapsing, price is slowing down and compressing.
That usually tells me the market is absorbing liquidity, not distributing .
Key things I’m focusing on:
Price is holding above ascending demand , which shows buyers are still defending structure.
Reactions from the demand zone are clean , not impulsive, a sign of controlled participation.
Overhead supply is present , which explains the compression instead of an instant breakout.
RSI bullish divergence adds confidence that downside momentum is weakening near demand.
My mindset here:
I’m not chasing moves.
I’m not panicking into demand.
I’m simply watching how price behaves here , because this zone decides whether the next move expands or fails.
As long as structure holds, patience matters more than prediction.
Disclaimer:
This analysis is for educational purposes only. Not financial advice. Always manage your risk.
Bitcoin Is Reacting, Not Breaking, Patience Before the Next MoveWhen I look at this chart, I don’t see panic or trend failure. I see price pulling back into a clearly defined demand area within a rising structure and responding from it. That matters. If sellers were truly in control, price wouldn’t pause here, it would slice through demand without hesitation. Instead, Bitcoin is holding above structure, absorbing selling pressure, and stabilising.
The repeated rejections from the upper supply zone show that resistance exists, but the key point is this: sellers are unable to push price into a breakdown. Momentum has cooled, volatility has compressed, and RSI has reset without price collapsing, all signs of balance, not weakness.
This phase feels slow and uncomfortable, especially for traders who expect constant movement, but historically this is where the market builds the base for its next decision. I’m not interested in chasing price near resistance, and I’m not interested in panic selling into demand. I want to observe how price behaves here, because reactions at structure tell the real story. As long as Bitcoin continues to respect this rising demand and doesn’t accept below it, the broader structure remains intact and upside expansion stays on the table. A clean break below structure would force me to rethink, until then, patience is the position. Sometimes the best trades don’t come from predicting the next candle. They come from waiting while price proves who is actually in control.
Disclaimer: This analysis is for educational purposes only and not financial advice. Always manage risk and trade according to your own plan.
Gold retraces after surge – trend remains intact.Quick Context
Recent geopolitical uncertainty continues to support safe-haven flows. Gold has already delivered a strong bullish impulse, and the current move looks like a healthy correction, not a reversal.
Technical Snapshot (H1–H4)
Strong bullish impulse already completed
Current price action = controlled retracement
No bearish CHoCH, no structural breakdown
Market is resetting momentum after expansion
This is typical impulse → retrace → continuation behavior.
Key Levels to Watch
Buy Zone: 5,180 – 5,160
Invalidation: H1 close below 5,120
Upside continuation targets:
5,300
5,360
Extension toward 5,440+
If – Then Logic
If price holds above 5,160 → expect continuation higher
If price sweeps into 5,180–5,160 and reacts → buy-the-dip opportunity
Only if H1 closes below 5,120 → bullish bias weakens
Bottom Line
Gold is not reversing — it is reloading.
Pullbacks are part of trend strength.
Wait for reaction, not confirmation at the highs.
USDJPY – A Global Repricing Phase, Not a Random MoveWhen I look at USDJPY, this move doesn’t feel random to me. It looks like part of a broader global adjustment phase rather than something driven by this pair alone.
Price Context:
Price spent a long time reacting from a major supply zone before showing a clear structure shift. Since then, the market has been respecting an ascending channel, with higher highs and higher lows.
Why this move makes sense:
As global risk sentiment shifts and interest rate expectations change, currencies often move together. That’s why similar moves are visible across multiple FX pairs, this is a broad-based repricing, not a pair-specific reaction.
Current Structure:
The recent pullback into demand and trend support looks like a healthy retracement, not a breakdown. As long as this structure holds, the broader trend remains intact.
Disclaimer: This analysis is for educational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Trading involves risk.
GBPUSD – Support Holding, Watching Reaction From RangeGBP/USD has reacted from a well-defined support zone, an area where buyers have stepped in multiple times before. Price is currently trading between clear support and resistance, indicating a short-term range environment.
As long as this support holds, upside reactions toward the resistance zone remain possible. A clean break below support, however, would weaken this structure and change the short-term bias.
This is a reaction-based zone, not a prediction. Let price confirm the next move.
Disclaimer: This analysis is for educational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Trading involves risk. Please manage risk responsibly.
Axis Bank | Intraday Price Behavior Using Square-Based GeometryDisclaimer:
This analysis is for educational purposes only. I am not a SEBI-registered advisor. This is not financial advice.
Educational Case Study | 1 April 2024
This idea shares an educational intraday case study on Axis Bank, focusing on how price capacity and time awareness were observed using square-based geometric methods discussed in classical market studies.
The objective is to study historical chart behavior, not to suggest trades or outcomes.
📊 Chart Context
Instrument: Axis Bank Ltd. (NSE)
Date: 1 April 2024
Timeframe: 15-minute (Intraday)
During the early part of the session, Axis Bank showed upward movement. A structured framework was applied to observe how price interacted with predefined reference levels as the session progressed.
🔍 Observational Framework Used
The low of the initial intraday structure was treated as a reference point (around 1048)
From this reference, square-based projections were observed
A level near 1064 aligned with a 45-degree projection, often associated with normal intraday price reach in historical studies
A higher projection was noted only as a contextual boundary, not an expectation
All levels were considered potential reaction zones, not fixed resistance points.
📈 Observed Intraday Behavior
Price gradually moved toward the projected zone during the session
Near this area, the market showed temporary pressure and difficulty sustaining above the level
A short-term response was observed around the projected zone
Minor price variation around the level was consistent with normal market behavior
This observation aligns with how price has historically interacted with similar geometric areas.
📘 Educational Takeaways
Square-based geometry can help outline logical intraday price capacity
The 45-degree projection often acts as an area of interest, not a precise barrier
Time awareness adds structure when observing intraday movement
Small deviations around projected zones are normal and expected
This approach encourages rule-based observation rather than precision fixation
All insights are based on historical chart study only.
📌 Important Note
This case study is shared strictly for learning and research purposes.
Geometric levels and time windows do not guarantee outcomes and should be treated as contextual analytical tools.
Market behavior may include:
Temporary pauses
Short-term pressure
Continuation or expansion depending on broader structure
🚀 Summary
This intraday case study demonstrates how price geometry and time alignment can be used to observe market behavior objectively and systematically.
More educational chart studies will follow.
Axis Bank | Intraday Price Behavior Near Square-Based LevelsDisclaimer:
This analysis is for educational purposes only. I am not a SEBI-registered advisor. This is not financial advice.
Educational Case Study | 8 April 2024
This idea documents an educational intraday case study on Axis Bank, focusing on how price–degree alignment and time awareness were observed using square-based geometric methods commonly referenced in classical market studies.
The purpose of this post is to study chart behavior, not to suggest or validate trades.
📊 Chart Context
Instrument: Axis Bank Ltd. (NSE)
Date: 8 April 2024
Timeframe: 15-minute (Intraday)
During the session, Axis Bank showed early upward momentum. A structured geometric framework was applied to observe how price behaved relative to predefined reference levels throughout the day.
🔍 Methodology (Observational Framework)
The session low was treated as a reference point for structure
From this reference, square-based projections were observed
A level near 1079 aligned with a 45-degree projection, often associated with normal intraday price reach in historical studies
Higher projections were noted only as contextual markers, not expectations
All levels were treated as potential reaction zones, not fixed barriers.
📈 Observed Intraday Behavior
Price approached the projected zone during mid-session
Near this area, the market showed temporary pressure and difficulty sustaining above the level
The broader intraday range remained contained within the projected boundary
This behavior aligned with previously observed historical responses around similar geometric zones
No execution, trade direction, or outcome is implied.
📘 Educational Takeaways
Square-based geometry can help define logical intraday price boundaries
Certain angles may act as areas of interest, depending on market context
Time awareness adds structure when observing intraday movement
This approach emphasizes price structure over indicators or signals
All insights are derived from historical chart observation only.
📌 Important Note
This case study is shared solely for learning and research purposes.
Geometric levels do not guarantee outcomes and should always be used as contextual tools.
Market behavior may include:
Temporary pauses
Short-term pressure
Range expansion or contraction depending on conditions
🚀 Summary
This intraday case study highlights how price geometry and time alignment can be used to observe market behavior in a structured and objective manner.
More educational chart studies will follow.
Axis Bank | Intraday Price-Time Observation Using Square-Based GDisclaimer:
This analysis is for educational purposes only. I am not a SEBI-registered advisor. This is not financial advice.
Educational Case Study | 21 October 2024
This idea presents an educational intraday case study on Axis Bank, focusing on how price–degree alignment and time awareness can be observed using square-based geometric methods commonly discussed in classical market studies.
The purpose of this post is to study chart behavior, not to suggest or validate trades.
📊 Chart Context
Instrument: Axis Bank (NSE)
Date: 21 October 2024
Timeframe: 15-minute (Intraday)
During the session, price showed a shift in momentum after reaching a higher price region. As the move developed, a structured geometric framework was used to observe how price behaved relative to predefined reference points.
🔍 Methodology Used (Observational)
A reference point was marked near 1214, from where price began to decline
From this reference, a 45-degree projection was observed using a square-based calculation method
The derived level appeared near 1197, representing a potential intraday reaction zone
Time was observed as an additional context factor, particularly how price behaved before later session hours
These levels were treated as areas of observation, not certainty points.
📈 Observed Market Behavior
Price approached the projected zone during the intraday session
Near this level, the market showed temporary pressure followed by a short-term response
The behavior aligned with historical observations where price interacts with similar geometric zones
The reaction highlighted how price and time together can influence intraday movement
No trade execution or outcome is implied.
📘 Key Educational Insights
Square-based geometry can help define normal intraday price reach
Certain angles may act as potential reaction areas, depending on context
Time awareness can add structure to intraday observation
This approach emphasizes market structure over indicators
All points are based on historical chart study, not forecasting.
📌 Educational Note
This case study is shared solely for learning and research purposes.
Geometric levels do not guarantee outcomes and should always be treated as contextual tools.
Market responses may vary based on:
Volatility
Liquidity
Broader market structure
🚀 Summary
This intraday case study demonstrates how price geometry and time awareness can be used to observe market behavior in a structured and disciplined way.
More educational observations will follow.
NIFTY 50 | Time-Cycle Observation Using Gann-Based MethodsDisclaimer:
This analysis is for educational purposes only. I am not a SEBI-registered advisor. This is not financial advice.
Educational Case Study | March–April 2023
This idea shares an educational case study highlighting how time-cycle concepts, often discussed in classical Gann literature, were observed on the NIFTY 50 index during March–April 2023.
The focus of this post is to study how time completion and price behavior interacted, rather than to present a forecast or trading outcome.
📊 Background of the Observation
On 13 March 2023, NIFTY 50 was trading near a time–price balance area identified through time-based analysis methods.
Rather than relying on indicators or news flow, the study examined how time progression aligned with subsequent price behavior — an approach commonly referenced as time leading price in classical analysis.
A 9-day time window was identified as an area of interest, with 24 March 2023 marking a notable time point for observation.
🔍 Market Behavior After Time Completion
Following the completion of the identified time window:
The index began showing positive momentum
Price expanded upward over the subsequent sessions
Part of the observed movement unfolded shortly after the time cycle completed
Additional price expansion continued as the broader structure evolved
This sequence provided an example of how price activity may increase after time completion, depending on market conditions.
📘 Key Educational Takeaways
Market expansion is often observed after time completion, rather than at obvious price levels
Time analysis can help identify periods of potential expansion or contraction
Studying time reduces emotional bias and improves patience
Gann-based methods focus on structure and rhythm, not precise prediction
All observations are based on historical chart behavior, not future expectations.
📌 Important Clarification
This post is shared only for study and research purposes.
No directional advice, trade execution, or performance guarantee is implied.
Time-based zones should be treated as:
Areas of observation
Potential reaction windows
Not fixed outcomes
📚 Additional Learning Resource
For readers interested in a detailed educational explanation of time-cycle concepts used in this chart study, a longer learning resource is available below:
nirajmsuratwala.in
(Shared strictly for educational reference)
🚀 Summary
This case study demonstrates how time-cycle observation, when combined with structure, can help traders study market rhythm objectively.
More educational case studies will follow.
Axis Bank | Observed Price Reaction Near a 45° LevelCase Study – 8 November 2024
This idea presents an educational case study focused on intraday price behavior near a geometric level, specifically a 45° projection, observed on Axis Bank on 8 November 2024.
The study is shared to understand how price, time, and structure may interact around predefined geometric zones — without any predictive or advisory intent.
📊 Chart Observation
On 8 November 2024, Axis Bank moved toward a projected level derived from a 45° calculation, originating from an intraday reference point using Square-of-9–based methodology.
The projected zone appeared near 1168
During the afternoon session, price showed temporary pressure and rejection around this area
The behavior aligned with previously observed reactions near similar geometric levels
This observation highlights how markets may respond near certain structural zones, depending on context and timing.
🔍 What This Case Study Illustrates
Identifying a 0° reference from an intraday extreme
Observing price movement capacity along a 45° path
Noting time sensitivity, where reactions often occur near specific time windows
Understanding how a geometric zone can act as a potential reaction area, rather than a fixed resistance
These observations are intended to support chart study and market behavior analysis, not decision-making shortcuts.
📌 Educational Note
This post discusses observed historical behavior on charts.
Geometric levels and angles represent areas of interest, not guaranteed outcomes.
Market behavior may include:
Temporary pauses
Short-term pressure
Expansion or continuation depending on broader structure
No trade direction or execution guidance is provided.
🚀 Conclusion
This case study demonstrates how combining geometry, structure, and time can add clarity to intraday chart analysis when used objectively.
More such educational observations will follow.
Disclaimer:
This analysis is for educational purposes only. I am not a SEBI-registered advisor. This is not financial advice.
BTC Compression Phase: Where Smart Money Builds Positions!Hey guy's, When I look at this chart, I’m not seeing fear or trend failure.
I’m seeing something far more important, controlled compression above demand .
Bitcoin has pulled back, swept liquidity, and is now holding above a clearly defined demand area while volatility keeps contracting.
This kind of behaviour rarely appears during panic.
It usually appears when the market is absorbing supply quietly .
What I’m seeing on the chart:
Price is still respecting the ascending demand structure , which tells me higher-timeframe buyers are active and defending key levels.
The recent move cleaned out weak hands below demand , but price did not accept lower, a classic liquidity sweep, not a breakdown.
Supply is visible above , which explains why price is compressing instead of expanding immediately. Sellers are present, but they are not overpowering buyers.
The range between ascending demand and overhead supply is tightening . This is where impatience builds, and where strong positioning usually happens.
The psychology part (this matters):
This phase feels uncomfortable.
Price isn’t doing much.
Both sides are frustrated.
And that’s usually a clue.
If Bitcoin wanted to break structure, it had a clean opportunity below demand.
It didn’t take it.
That tells me sellers are getting weaker, not stronger.
So my thinking stays simple:
I don’t want to chase upside after expansion.
I don’t want to panic into a sell-off that already swept liquidity.
I want to watch how price reacts around demand, because this is where real decisions are made.
As long as structure holds:
Pullbacks into the 88k–87k demand zone remain high-probability reaction areas.
Compression above demand keeps the door open for a mean-reversion move toward higher levels.
Only a clean breakdown and acceptance below ~84k would invalidate this structure.
Until then, I’m not trying to predict the next candle.
I’m trying to read behaviour .
Markets don’t move when everyone is excited.
They move when most people get bored, confused, or impatient.
Disclaimer:
This analysis is for educational purposes only. Not financial advice. Always manage risk and trade according to your own plan.
NSE FINNIFTY - Price Action BreakdownNSE FINIFTY is trading in the value area for more than 43 weeks. The price has overall three excesses at the upper band and three excesses at the lower band. This signals bull dominance. The control line validates itself with 11 touches.
Traders must look at the following scenario:
1. Price is at the control line, and 200 EMa has worked as crucial support. This is a powerful hurdle and can change the trend. This can reach up to 27500 - 28100 .
2. If sellers outnumber buyers by closing below the control line and EMAs, the next support level would be around 25,926.
We will update further information soon.
EURUSD – Breakout From Falling Resistance, Retest Holding WellEUR/USD was trading under a falling resistance trendline for a long time, with sellers consistently stepping in at higher levels. Recently, price managed to break above this trendline, which was the first sign that bearish pressure was easing.
After the breakout, price came back for a retest of the broken structure and previous resistance area. This retest is holding well so far, showing that buyers are defending the level and not allowing price to slip back below the structure.
What stands out here is how price respected the retest and then pushed higher, leaving behind a small imbalance. This often indicates acceptance above the breakout level rather than a false move.
As long as price holds above the retest zone and structure support, the path of least resistance remains to the upside, with higher resistance levels marked on the chart. A clean breakdown below this area would invalidate the bullish view.
This is a structure-based idea, not a prediction. Let price continue to confirm.
Disclaimer: This analysis is for educational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Trading involves risk. Please manage risk responsibly.
GBPUSD – Breakout Retest Looks Healthy, Bulls in ControlGBP/USD has been trading below a falling resistance trendline for quite some time. Recently, price managed to break above this trendline, which is the first sign that selling pressure is weakening.
After the breakout, price did not continue straight up. Instead, it came back for a retest, and that retest is holding well so far. This is usually a healthy sign, showing that buyers are willing to step in at higher levels instead of letting price fall back below structure.
What Price Is Telling Us:
Price is respecting the previous resistance as support and forming higher lows. Sellers are trying, but they are unable to push price back below the trendline. This behavior often appears when the market is preparing for continuation rather than reversal.
As long as price holds above this zone, the bullish bias remains intact, with upside levels marked on the chart. A clean breakdown below the structure would invalidate this view.
This is a structure-based idea, not a prediction. Let price do the work.
If this analysis helped you, like, follow, and comment for more clean Forex breakdowns.
Disclaimer: This analysis is for educational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Trading involves risk, and past performance does not guarantee future results. Please manage risk responsibly.
USDCHF – Gap Down From Resistance, Price Testing Key Support!USD/CHF was trading near a well-defined resistance zone where price has faced repeated rejection in the past. This clearly showed that sellers were active at higher levels and the market was struggling to sustain upside momentum.
From this resistance, the market opened with a gap down, which often signals aggressive selling and position unwinding rather than a slow intraday move. The gap was also supported by short-term U.S. dollar weakness, as the market adjusted expectations around risk sentiment and interest rates. When dollar weakness aligns with technical resistance, price usually reacts sharply.
After the gap down, price moved lower toward a major support zone, an area where buyers have previously stepped in. This makes the current zone a key decision point, either buyers defend again, or further downside continuation opens up.
This move is a result of both technical rejection and fundamental pressure, not random price action.
Disclaimer
This analysis is for educational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Trading involves risk, and past performance does not guarantee future results. Please manage risk responsibly.
NIFTY : Intraday Trading levels and Plan for 23-Jan-2026📘 NIFTY Trading Plan – 23 Jan 2026
Timeframe: 15-Minute
Gap Considered: 100+ Points
Market Context: After a sharp intraday recovery from lower levels, NIFTY is now approaching a key decision-making zone. Trend is still corrective, with range expansion possible on either side.
🔼 SCENARIO 1: GAP UP OPENING (100+ points) 🚀
If NIFTY opens above 25,498, it indicates follow-through buying and short-covering.
The zone 25,498 – 25,537 will act as the first opening resistance.
Sustained 15-min close above 25,537 can trigger momentum toward:
• 25,666 – 25,718 (Last Resistance Zone)
Above 25,718, trend strength improves and fresh longs may emerge.
Failure to sustain above 25,498 = high probability of rejection and pullback.
📌 Educational Insight:
Gap-up openings near resistance often trap late buyers. Confirmation is mandatory before aggressive longs.
📌 Options View:
• Bull Call Spread preferred over naked CE
• Partial profit booking near resistance
• Avoid chasing premiums 🚀
➡️ SCENARIO 2: FLAT / RANGE OPENING ⚖️
If NIFTY opens between 25,301 – 25,378, expect range-bound and whipsaw price action.
This zone acts as a No-Trade Zone / Balance Area.
Multiple fake breakouts are likely.
Upside confirmation only above 25,498.
Downside weakness below 25,301.
Wait for a 15-min close outside the range before taking trades.
📌 Educational Insight:
Flat opens after volatile sessions usually lead to time correction, not directional moves.
📌 Options View:
• Iron Fly / Short Strangle with strict SL
• Low quantity & fast exits
• Protect capital over profits ⏳
🔽 SCENARIO 3: GAP DOWN OPENING (100+ points) 📉
If NIFTY opens below 25,301, sellers regain short-term control.
Immediate support lies near 25,177.
Break below 25,177 opens downside toward:
• 25,031 – 25,077 (Last Intraday Support)
Below 25,030, bearish momentum can accelerate.
Any pullback toward 25,301 – 25,378 should be treated as sell-on-rise.
📌 Educational Insight:
Gap-down opens demand patience — let volatility settle before initiating trades.
📌 Options View:
• Bear Put Spread preferred
• Avoid PE selling in falling markets
• Trail stop-loss aggressively 📉
🧠 Risk Management Tips for Options Traders 🛡️
Risk only 1–2% of capital per trade.
Expiry proximity = faster theta decay.
Prefer spreads over naked options.
No candle confirmation = no trade.
Avoid overtrading inside no-trade zones.
📌 Summary & Conclusion ✨
NIFTY is trading near a critical equilibrium zone.
📍 25,301 – 25,378 = decision area
📍 Strength only above 25,498 → 25,718
📍 Weakness below 25,301 → 25,177 → 25,030
Patience, discipline, and level-based execution will be key for 23 Jan.
⚠️ Disclaimer
This analysis is strictly for educational purposes only.
I am not a SEBI registered analyst.
Markets are uncertain and I may be wrong.
Please consult your financial advisor before trading.
SUPREMEIND – STWP Equity Snapshot 📊 SUPREMEIND – Technical & Educational Snapshot
Ticker: NSE: SUPREMEIND
Sector: 🧪 Chemicals / Plastics
CMP: 3,500.80 ▲ (+4.15% | 22 Jan 2026)
Learning Rating: ⭐⭐⭐⭐☆ (Neutral–Range with Recovery Bias)
Chart Pattern Observed: 📊 Range Structure with Recovery from Demand
Candlestick Pattern Observed: Bullish Engulfing
📊 Technical Snapshot
SUPREMEIND is attempting a short-term stabilisation after a sharp corrective phase, with the latest daily candle showing a strong bullish response from lower demand zones. RSI is placed near 52.5, indicating neutral momentum with early signs of internal strength but no overbought pressure yet. Stochastic is around the mid-zone, suggesting recovery from oversold conditions rather than trend exhaustion. Bollinger Bands remain wide, reflecting elevated volatility and a market still adjusting after the decline, while price continues to trade below major supply zones — keeping the broader structure range-bound with recovery bias. MACD remains subdued, highlighting that momentum improvement is still developing rather than fully established. Price is currently interacting near the CPR band, which is relatively wide, typically associated with range-bound or two-sided price action. As long as price remains within or below the CPR zone, upside moves may face supply pressure, while sustained acceptance above the CPR pivot would be required to signal any meaningful directional shift.
📊 Volume Analysis
🔹 Current Volume: ~536K
🔹 Average Volume (20-period): ~252K ✅
💥 Volume is running at more than 2× the recent average, confirming active participation during the rebound from demand.
💡 Interpretation: Higher-than-average volume near support zones suggests genuine buying interest and supply absorption. However, for any sustained move toward upper range resistance, similar volume expansion will be required near higher levels to confirm acceptance.
🔑 Key Levels – Daily Timeframe
Support Areas: 3373 | 3258 | 3194
Resistance Areas: 3552 | 3616 | 3731
These are zones where price has paused or reacted earlier.
What’s Catching Our Eye: Sharp demand-led rebound with strong participation.
What to Watch For: Acceptance above CPR and nearby resistance.
Failure Zone: Loss of the recent demand base.
Risks to Watch: Overhead supply and wide CPR.
What to Expect Next: Range-bound move with recovery bias.
Bullish Case: Sustained Demand absorption may support recovery.
Bearish Case: Failure to hold Demand base risks deeper reversion.
Momentum Case: Strong Rebound momentum, needs follow-through.
STWP Equity Snapshot – SUPREMEIND
Intraday Setup:
Entry: 3,500.8
Invalidation level: 3,237.11
Reference 1: 3,817.23
Reference 2: 4,028.18
Swing Setup (Hybrid Model – 2–5 days):
Entry: 3,500.8
Invalidation level: 3,151.67
Reference 1: 4,199.06
Reference 2: 4,722.75
STWP View: Momentum: Strong | Trend: Range | Risk: High |Volume: High
Learning Note: Focus on structure, risk per trade and clean reviews – not prediction.
Disclaimer:
Educational view only. Not a Buy/Sell recommendation. Please consult a SEBI-registered advisor before making any decision. STWP is not responsible for trading decisions based on this post.
💬 Did this help you read the chart better?
🔼 Boost | ✍️ Comment | 🔁 Share with a learner
👉 Follow STWP for clean chart-reading insights
🚀 Stay Calm. Stay Clean. Trade With Patience.
POLICYBZR - STWP Equity Snapshot📊 STWP Equity Snapshot – PB Fintech Ltd (POLICYBZR)
(Educational | Chart-Based Interpretation)
POLICYBZR continues to trade within a well-defined range structure, with repeated rejection from the 1960–2000 supply / distribution zone and consistent buyer activity emerging near the 1650–1609 demand / value zone. The stock has once again reverted from upper supply and is currently attempting a recovery from this demand region. The area around 1720–1740 now acts as a near-term balance zone. Holding above this region keeps the recovery attempt structurally valid and allows price to test higher reaction zones near 1755 and 1790, where selling pressure has appeared previously. However, sustained acceptance above these levels would be required to improve directional confidence. On the downside, continued weakness below 1650, and especially below 1609, would signal structural weakness and increase the probability of deeper mean reversion within the range. Until either boundary is resolved, price action should be viewed as rotation rather than trend development.
Recent market conditions reflect a neutral but stabilising environment. The recent strong bullish candle highlights buyer response from demand, but not trend confirmation. Bollinger Band behaviour shows that price is emerging from a compressed phase, with early expansion attempts visible, though follow-through remains limited. The BB squeeze context indicates potential for movement, but direction remains undecided. RSI near 45–46 reflects balanced momentum, consistent with a range-bound market rather than a trending phase. Price interaction with short-term averages suggests short-term stabilisation, while the wide CPR structure reinforces expectations of two-sided activity, consolidation, and rotational price behaviour instead of immediate directional continuation.
Volume analysis adds important context to the recovery attempt. Participation has improved during the recent bounce from demand, indicating active buyer involvement rather than a low-liquidity reaction. At the same time, volume intensity remains moderate (Vol X near 1.0), with no signs of climax or exhaustion. Selling phases have not been accompanied by aggressive volume expansion, suggesting controlled supply rather than panic distribution. Overall, volume behaviour supports range stability and validates the demand-side response, while still falling short of confirming accumulation or breakout intent.
From a short swing perspective, POLICYBZR remains structurally neutral as long as price trades between the 1650–1609 demand zone and the 1960–2000 supply zone. Acceptance above intermediate resistance would be required to shift bias toward higher range expansion. Conversely, sustained acceptance below 1609 would elevate downside risk and suggest continuation of mean reversion toward lower structural levels. Until such confirmation occurs, consolidation and rotational movement within the range should be expected.
Final Outlook (Condition-Based):
Momentum is improving but not decisive, the trend remains range-bound, risk is elevated due to overhead supply, and volume is supportive but non-confirmatory.
💡 STWP Learning Note
In range markets, demand reactions show interest — only acceptance above supply confirms intent.
⚠️ Disclaimer
This post is shared strictly for educational and informational purposes. It is not investment advice or a recommendation. Please consult a SEBI-registered financial advisor before making any financial decision.
🚀 Stay Calm. Stay Clean. Trade With Patience.
ASTRAL - STWP Equity Snapshot📊 STWP Equity Snapshot – Astral Ltd (ASTRAL)
(Educational | Chart-Based Interpretation)
ASTRAL continues to trade within a broader range-bound structure, with price oscillating between well-defined supply and demand zones rather than establishing a sustained trend. After facing rejection near the 1593–1600 supply zone, price moved into a corrective phase and recently reacted from the 1333–1293 demand region, where buyers have previously stepped in. The current price is stabilising near the 1424 balance area, which now acts as an important near-term reference. Holding above this zone keeps the structure intact and allows price to retest higher reaction zones near 1441–1470, where selling pressure has emerged earlier. On the downside, sustained weakness below 1367, and more importantly below the 1333 demand zone, would increase downside risk and reinforce the broader range structure. Until price decisively exits either boundary, movement should be viewed as rotation within the range rather than trend development.
Indicator readings reflect a mixed but stabilising environment. The recent strong bullish candle with open near the low signals short-term buyer response from demand rather than trend confirmation. Bollinger Band behaviour highlights prior volatility contraction, with early signs of expansion emerging, though follow-through remains limited. The BB squeeze context suggests the market is transitioning from compression toward potential movement, but direction is still undecided. RSI near 47 indicates balanced momentum, neither weak nor strong, aligning with the ongoing range structure. Price interaction with short-term averages shows attempts at stabilisation, while a wide CPR structure reinforces the expectation of two-sided trade and consolidation rather than immediate directional continuation.
Volume behaviour provides constructive but cautious confirmation. Participation has expanded during the recent rebound, indicating active involvement from buyers near demand rather than a low-volume reaction. At the same time, volume intensity remains within a healthy range (Vol X ~1.4–1.5), with no signs of climax or exhaustion. Selling phases have not shown aggressive volume expansion, suggesting supply pressure is controlled. Overall, volume dynamics support range stability and recovery attempts but stop short of confirming accumulation or breakout intent.
From a short swing perspective, ASTRAL remains structurally neutral as long as price trades between the 1333–1293 demand zone and the 1593–1600 supply zone. Acceptance above intermediate resistance levels would be required to improve directional confidence toward higher range-expansion zones. Conversely, sustained acceptance below 1293 would elevate downside risk and shift focus toward deeper structural demand. Until either boundary is resolved, consolidation and rotation within the range should be expected.
Final Outlook (Condition-Based):
Momentum is improving but not decisive, the trend remains range-bound, risk stays elevated due to proximity to both demand and supply, and volume is supportive but not confirming a directional shift.
💡 STWP Learning Note
Range markets reward patience and structure awareness more than prediction.
⚠️ Disclaimer
This post is shared strictly for educational and informational purposes. It is not investment advice or a recommendation. Please consult a SEBI-registered financial advisor before making any financial decision.
🚀 Stay Calm. Stay Clean. Trade With Patience.






















